Penn State
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
110  Elizabeth Chikotas FR 20:06
155  Leigha Anderson SR 20:15
196  Tori Gerlach JR 20:22
210  Jillian Hunsberger FR 20:25
467  Katie Rodden SR 20:54
480  Abbie Benson SR 20:55
692  Stephanie Aldrich SO 21:11
960  Lauren Mills SR 21:30
1,226  Cara Ulizio SO 21:48
1,487  Julie Kocjancic SO 22:03
1,632  Hannah Catalano FR 22:11
1,691  Megan Hellman FR 22:14
2,297  Lisa Bennatan FR 22:53
National Rank #32 of 341
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #3 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 30.3%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 10 at Nationals 1.2%
Top 20 at Nationals 11.1%


Regional Champion 0.3%
Top 5 in Regional 99.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Elizabeth Chikotas Leigha Anderson Tori Gerlach Jillian Hunsberger Katie Rodden Abbie Benson Stephanie Aldrich Lauren Mills Cara Ulizio Julie Kocjancic Hannah Catalano
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/03 671 20:03 20:15 20:07 20:41 21:21 20:55 21:00 22:11 21:32
Penn State National 10/11 1248 21:39 21:40 22:40 21:54
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 722 19:43 20:14 20:26 21:07 20:56 21:01 21:25
Big Ten Conference Championships 11/02 796 20:04 20:42 20:20 20:36 21:39 21:23 21:56 22:28
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/14 879 21:16 20:32 20:09 20:34 21:15 21:12
NCAA Championship 11/22 20:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 30.3% 22.3 540 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.0 1.9 2.0
Region Championship 100% 3.4 105 0.3 5.4 53.7 33.6 6.2 0.7 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elizabeth Chikotas 74.6% 93.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Leigha Anderson 49.9% 118.0 0.0 0.0
Tori Gerlach 37.8% 136.5
Jillian Hunsberger 34.0% 146.7
Katie Rodden 30.3% 210.7
Abbie Benson 30.3% 213.1
Stephanie Aldrich 30.3% 236.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elizabeth Chikotas 10.6 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.0 4.6 5.7 7.1 7.7 7.7 8.7 8.5 8.2 7.7 6.0 5.4 4.4 3.4 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3
Leigha Anderson 14.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.7 3.2 4.2 4.7 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.4 6.7 6.5 6.3 5.4 5.2 4.5 3.7 3.3 2.4 2.1 1.8
Tori Gerlach 18.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.1 4.1 4.9 5.2 5.5 6.6 6.2 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7 5.3 5.1 4.0 3.5
Jillian Hunsberger 20.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.1 3.4 3.6 4.6 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.8 6.7 6.0 5.1 5.3 5.2 4.6
Katie Rodden 40.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.5
Abbie Benson 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.2
Stephanie Aldrich 57.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 1
2 5.4% 100.0% 5.4 5.4 2
3 53.7% 33.6% 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 2.7 7.0 35.6 18.1 3
4 33.6% 17.3% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.9 27.8 5.8 4
5 6.2% 11.9% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 5.5 0.7 5
6 0.7% 0.7 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.0% 0.0 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 30.3% 0.3 5.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 3.8 9.1 69.7 5.7 24.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Ohio State 84.5% 1.0 0.8
Toledo 67.0% 1.0 0.7
Princeton 19.9% 1.0 0.2
SMU 18.3% 1.0 0.2
Tulsa 7.4% 2.0 0.1
Bradley 4.7% 2.0 0.1
Yale 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Rice 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Illinois 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Southern Illinois 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Utah 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 2.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 7.0